Obama: 'Fundamentally transforming the United States of America'
Barack Obama is an enigma. He won the 2008 presidential election claiming to be a moderate and wanting to bring Americans together and govern from the center. But since he took office, his actions have been far from moderate.
He has apologized to foreign dictators abroad for sins he alleges his own country committed and appointed a self-described communist (Van Jones) and an admirer of Mao Zedong to top White House posts. He has used the economic crisis to take over whole industries and has attempted to nationalize the health care system. In his first nine months in office, these actions had already made his presidency one of the most polarizing in history.
Many Americans have gone from hopefulness, through unease, to a state of alarm as the President shows a radical side that was only partially visible during his campaign. To understand Obama’s presidency, Americans need to know more about the man and the nature of his political ideas. In particular, they need to become familiar with a Chicago organizer named Saul Alinsky and the strategy of deception he devised to promote social change.
Of no other occupant of the White House can it be said that he owed his understanding of the political process to a man and a philosophy so outside the American mainstream, or so explicitly dedicated to opposing it. The pages that follow provide an analysis of the political manual that Saul Alinsky wrote, which outlines his method for advancing radical agendas. The manual was originally titled “Rules for Revolution” which is an accurate description of its content. Later, Alinsky changed the title to Rules for Radicals.
After familiarizing themselves with its ideas, readers may want to reconsider what Obama may have meant on election eve 2008 when he told his followers: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
Of more interest to me however, was the extensive list of coalition members. First of all, among this list are many union organizations. Decide for yourself if union organizations are good for the overall population of America. Among those unions listed is SEIU which is the fastest growing health care union in North America. SEIU is the largest property services union and the second largest public services union. There are also connections between Barack Obama and SEIU. Listed also is ACORN, I am sure you are well aware of them.
Planned Parenthood supports the coalition along with abortion, government funded abortion. The NEA, Radical Health Network, OFA of Central PA (Organizing for America), this is Obama's campaign website (Now this is not a conflict of interest in any way), Bus Project, who claims to be non-partisan, however they support Health Care for America Now, which is obviously a very liberal and left organization seeing as how it is supported by OFA. A cervical cancer organization even supports HCAN. Have they even read the bill?
Friends, there are so many other organizations listed as part of their coalition that it would take too long to list them all. I will continue to research the list however. It takes a lot of work to research each name listed. At first I was under the impression that the news released was put out late because they were getting smart. But, now I am just beginning to realize it probably has more to do with how much they have to hide.
Why does all of this matter? Did your parents ever say to you when you were little that the company you keep is a representation of who you are and how you will be received? Hmm? Health Care for America Now is trying to sell the American people on this ludicrous bill that will compromise our privacy, liberties, freedoms, and financial freedom. If you are going to buy something as serious as health coverage from someone, do you not want to be able to trust the person who is trying to sell it to you?
California Democratic Party Chairman John Burton says one of the state's most politically powerful unions has threatened to cut off funding for the party over his support for a group that has broken away from the labor organization.
The rift could drive a wedge between the party and one of its most generous donors. The state council of the Service Employees International Union has directed $700,000 to the Democratic Party since 2007 and millions more to Democratic candidates and causes.
Burton said SEIU’s California president, Bill Lloyd, made the threat as Burton was set to appear last week at a San Francisco fundraiser for the splinter group, the National Union of Healthcare Workers. "They threatened me," said the 76-year-old Burton.
Burton said that he was championing union workers "when [SEIU's national president] Andy Stern was in college." He hailed the breakaway union's leader, Sal Rosselli, as a lifelong friend and “one of the strongest labor leaders in this state.”
Hate-crime, beat-down victim Kenneth Gladney blown off
On August 6th Kenneth Gladney attended the Russ Carnahan town hall meeting in south St. Louis County. Kenneth was there to make some money selling freedom flags and buttons.
After the meeting Kenneth was assaulted, beaten and stomped by angry SEIU thugs who were upset that a black man would be selling anti-Obama merchandise. Gladney was taken to the hospital following the attack.
St. Louis County officials have yet to press charges. It’s been over 3 months and County officials have not met with Kenneth Gladney to discuss the case nor have they press charges against the SEIU thugs who beat him.
Today after Kenneth set up an appointment with the county officials to discuss the crime– they blew him off. Kenneth made the appointment and they totally ignored him. Later, Kenneth Gladney talked about how the county is ignoring the crime against him:
The Star has obtained documents in which Vale Inco is suing United Steelworkers Local 6500 and 19 strikers for $25 million in damages for intimidation, nuisance, unlawful confinement, intentional infliction of mental distress, injurious falsehood, conspiring to injure the plaintiff in its operations, including breach of contract, and interference in economic and contractual relationships.
In those documents, Vale Inco says it is losing $7 million US a day in production because strikers are hindering access to its plants operating during the strike. The two sides are to appear in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on Friday.
In legal papers served against defendants last week, Vale Inco is also seeking $1 million in punitive and exemplary damages as well as court costs.
USW Local 6500 in Sudbury and Local 6200's 130 members in Port Colborne have been on strike since July 13. Another 400 Steelworkers have been on strike against the company in Voisey's Bay since Aug. 1.
Vale's case against the Sudbury strikers is contained in three bound volumes, each two inches thick, in which the company alleges hundreds of infractions of picket line protocol established in a July 29 injunction.
Obama: 'Fundamentally transforming the United States of America'He has apologized to foreign dictators abroad for sins he alleges his own country committed and appointed a self-described communist (Van Jones) and an admirer of Mao Zedong to top White House posts. He has used the economic crisis to take over whole industries and has attempted to nationalize the health care system. In his first nine months in office, these actions had already made his presidency one of the most polarizing in history.
Many Americans have gone from hopefulness, through unease, to a state of alarm as the President shows a radical side that was only partially visible during his campaign. To understand Obama’s presidency, Americans need to know more about the man and the nature of his political ideas. In particular, they need to become familiar with a Chicago organizer named Saul Alinsky and the strategy of deception he devised to promote social change.
Of no other occupant of the White House can it be said that he owed his understanding of the political process to a man and a philosophy so outside the American mainstream, or so explicitly dedicated to opposing it. The pages that follow provide an analysis of the political manual that Saul Alinsky wrote, which outlines his method for advancing radical agendas. The manual was originally titled “Rules for Revolution” which is an accurate description of its content. Later, Alinsky changed the title to Rules for Radicals.
After familiarizing themselves with its ideas, readers may want to reconsider what Obama may have meant on election eve 2008 when he told his followers: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
