Keep Israel Safe from Obama

Fundamental transformation becomes global public safety hazard


Related video clips:
'Fundamentally transforming the U.S.A.'
'The fundamental flaw of this country'

Obama thugs crack down on dissent

Because Progressives H8 everyone else


Alinsky explains Progs' H8, fear

Why Tea Party Scares Elitist Liberal Establishment
This is how I explain it in the talks I've been giving to Tea Party meetings.

Did you ever wonder why the Tea Party movement scares the liberal establishment so?

Why they accuse you of being “Astroturf.”

Why they hysterically accuse Tea Partiers of being racist, sexist and homophobic?

The answer is in Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.”

Alinsky says that “Power has always derived from two main sources, money and people. Lacking money, the have-nots must build power from their own flesh and blood.”

So when the liberal establishment looks at the Tea Party what do they see? They see real people, lots and lots of real people, a diverse group of real people building power with their own flesh and blood.

That’s got to scare them to death.
(from davidsvrwc.blogspot.com)

Bonus links:
Summary of Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals'
• More Saul Alinsky stories: here
'Rules for Radicals' at amazon.com

Related video:

The Old Gray Lady of CultureSmog

Andrew Klavan takes on The New York Times


Obama bares collectivist fangs again

Senses no limits on his entitlement of political power


WH unveils stock answer vending machines

Obama hopes to repair damage with lamestreams


(from optoons.blogspot.com)

Nanny of the Month Exposed!

There were no actual flag-related stabbings



Tax-funded Hamas coming to your 'hood

LSM takes a pass on Obama global social-justice push
Presidential Determination No. 2009-15 of January 27, 2009
Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related To Gaza
Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the "Act"), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act in an amount not to exceed $20.3 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs of Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
(from thefederalregister.com)

WaPo PO'd at Obama's NYT fetish

Or just a Freudian slip?

malcom x

(from gawker.com)

Obama hearts BigBad Bailouts

Obama-Cloward-Piven strategy fundamentally transforms U.S.


Related video clips:
'Fundamentally transforming the U.S.A.'
'The fundamental flaw of this country'

U.S. labor law cancels management rights

Does your employer really want the NLRB up their a$$?
1. They cannot tell employees that management will fire or punish employees if they engage in union activity.

2. They cannot lay off or discharge an employees for union activity.

3. They cannot bar employees' union representatives from signing union petitions during non-working hours.

4. They cannot bar employees from discussing the union during working hours (in non-patient areas) provided it does not interfere with patient care.

5. They cannot ask employees about confidential union matters, meetings, etc.

6. They cannot ask employees about the union representatives.

7. They cannot ask employees how they intend to vote.

8. They cannot ask employees whether or not they belong to a union or have signed a petition for a union.

9. They cannot, by the nature of the work assignment, create conditions intended to get rid of an employee because of his/her union activity.

10. They cannot threaten employees or coerce them in any way in an attempt to influence their vote.

11. They cannot tell employees that existing benefits will be discontinued if the facility is unionized.

12. They cannot say unionization will force management to lay off staff.

13. They cannot say unionization will take away benefits and privileges presently in effect.

14. They cannot promise employees promotions, raises or other benefits if they get out of the union or refrain from joining it.

Any of the above acts constitutes a violation of the National Labor Relations Act. You can protect your right to organize.

(from pennanurses.org)

SWAT teams bedevil patriots

Paranoia consumes Obamunists


Energy H8ers' hoax exposed!

When it comes to CO2, seeing in believing



Related Posts with Thumbnails