1/21/08

How a labor-state maintains gov't-union security

Governor Ted Kulongoski has given public employees another 5 percent raise. The governor states this was the result of a collective bargaining agreement. The outrage was almost immediate, but by and large the outrage missed the essential problem.

There are two essential problems and they will be ignored completely by the mainstream media. The first is how the raise is categorized. it is classified as an "additional step increase." For the uninitiated, a a step increase is a salary increase that is granted for simply remaining employed for another year. It is in addition to the regular (and usually annual) salary increase. When the public is told about the salary increases bargained for by the public employee unions, the amounts disclosed do not include the step increase. Thus, what appears to be relative modest annual salary increases are in actuality, compounded by the addition of the "step increase." For the public employee unions and their supporters, it is important to mask the true amount of annual raises to minimize adverse public reaction.

But it is the second issue that is the most important and which is routinely ignored by the mainstream press, even though they have an undue fascination with "public corruption," real or perceived, in every other facet of government.

In traditional labor-management relationships, there is organized labor on one side and management on the other. The unions are ostensibly beholden to their members, the employees, while management is beholden to the owners or shareholders. There is is a tension that exists which is likely to result in an appropriate balance - sufficiently robust wages to attract quality workers vs. low enough wages to ensure that business remains competitive in an open marketplace.

But that tension does not exist in the case of the public employee unions simply because the management structure - elected and appointed officials - are beholden to those who place them in office rather than the shareholders - the taxpayers. In Oregon, the Democrat party is largely financed by the public employee unions. In Oregon, the public employee unions have a substantial influence on who is selected to run in the Democrat party. In Oregon, the current governor acknowledged this during his last gubernatorial campaign on July 25, 2006, in a speech to the AFL-CIO which is dominated by the public employee unions: " ... I've never lost sight of who I represent, and that's you."

In response to the substantial financial and "volunteer" support Kulongoski received from the public employee unions, he has returned the favor in spades. Kulongoski appointed three former public employee union officials to his three top administration spots - chief of staff, deputy chief of staff and communications director. He negotiated a generous wage increase for the public employee unions and thereafter secured the funding for it through the Democrat-controlled Legislature. He declared reform of the burdensome and overly generous PERS system off limits. Kulongoski has routinely authorized "sole source" contracts with the public employee unions, which prohibit the state from outsourcing any function that was previously performed by a public employee union member, thus ensuring continuing inefficiency. Kulongoski signed into law a provision that deprives public employees the right to a secret ballot as to whether to unionize and thus makes them vulnerable to intimidation by the public employee union representatives - many of whom would scare the bejeezus out of a professional wrestler.

And when the public employee unions whined about the exorbitant salary increases Kulongoski granted to his supervisors, including the three previously mentioned former public employee union officers, Kulongoski immediately folded and granted the public employee unions yet another salary increase, all of this in the space of 12 months.

The system we have in place in Oregon is pernicious at best. Men and women are required to join the public employee unions as a condition of employment. They are required to make mandatory payments to the public employee unions. These mandatory payments result in more than $55 million dollars being available to the public employee unions each biennium to fund political activities designed to ensure that officials like Gov. Kulongoski are elected and remain in office. By using these vast sums to ensure that people who depend on their political largesse are elected, the public employee unions ensure that those with whom they negotiate are beholden to them and grant them robust salary increases, handsome pensions, ease in imposing mandatory membership on new employees, and unlimited political power. And all of this at the expense of the taxpayers.

This is a system that goes largely unnoticed and unappreciated by the average Oregonian, in part because average Oregonians are so busy trying to put food on their table that the cannot pay attention to the nuances of political power, and in part because Oregon's mainstream media refuses to disturb the liberal status quo.

In the end, the public employee unions and their Democrat stalwarts will overstep their bounds. They can't help it - power and greed are insatiable masters. But until they do, the public employee unions, the single most powerful political force in Oregon, will continue to pick the pockets of the taxpayers as they have done expertly during 2007.

(brainstormnw.com)

No comments:

Related Posts with Thumbnails